Pogo-sticking is when a searcher clicks a result, comes straight back to the results page, clicks another, and repeats until something satisfies them. Google has said publicly that it does not use it as a ranking signal, because people go back for too many reasons. Testimony in the 2023 antitrust trial confirmed that Google does use aggregated click behaviour over long periods. Both statements can be true, and neither changes what a page needs to do.
What Google has said
That it tries not to use signals like this for ranking, because a return to the results page can mean the answer was wrong, or that it was so right the searcher was done in five seconds, or that they wanted a second opinion. Google's staff described it as too hard to refine into a fair signal and said it is not something to worry about.
What the trial and the leak added
In 2023 Google's search leadership described under oath a system, in use since around 2005, that uses months of aggregated click data, sliced by country and device, to adjust rankings. Documents made public in 2024 named measures distinguishing good clicks from bad ones and recording the last, longest click on a result. So user behaviour in aggregate is an input somewhere in Google's systems. What has not been shown is that any single page's bounce pattern is scored and acted on.
Why the answer does not change what you do
If clicks matter, a page that sends people back to the results loses. If they do not, a page that sends people back to the results has still failed to convert a visitor who wanted what it promised. Either way the fix is the same: make the title an honest promise, put the answer where it can be seen without scrolling, and give the reader a reason to stay or a clear next step.
How to see it in your own data
You cannot see returns to Google directly. You can see the proxy: pages with a good position, healthy impressions, and a click rate that keeps drifting down. That combination usually means the result is being chosen, disappointing, and slowly being chosen less.
Sources
Where this shows up in the tracker
Every term in this glossary is something the product actually measures or acts on. Plans start at £29 a month, with rank tracking, AI visibility, the daily AI readiness scan, security and domain health, Search Console, backlinks and audits on every one of them.
Related terms
CTR
Click-through rate is the share of people who saw your result and clicked it: clicks divided by impressions, shown as a percentage in Search Console. It falls steeply with position, so it only means anything when compared against the position it was earned at. Whether Google uses clicks to rank is a question with two honest halves, covered below.
Dwell time
Dwell time is the time between a searcher clicking a result and returning to the search results page. It is a concept from the SEO industry, not a metric Google publishes or has confirmed using. Bounce rate is an analytics figure, the share of visits that view one page, and Google's ranking systems have no access to your analytics at all. Both are worth watching for what they say about your pages, not for what they do to your rankings.
Title tag
The page title is the text in a page's title element, shown as the clickable headline in search results. Google uses it as the main source for that headline, along with the visible heading, link text and other prominent text, and will rewrite it when it judges the title unhelpful. A good title says specifically what the page is, in the words the searcher used, without padding.
Featured snippet
A featured snippet is a result where Google shows a passage from a page first, above the page's title and link, usually at the top of the results, to answer the query directly. Google's systems choose the page automatically; there is no markup that requests it. Since 2020 a page shown as the snippet is not repeated lower down, and Search Console counts it as position one.