Turn a month of findings into a task list your web company cannot argue with

The problem with sending someone a dashboard

If you are not technical, the gap between "my tool says there are 47 issues" and "here is what I need you to do" is enormous, and it is the gap where most small business SEO work dies. You forward a login. Your web company opens it, sees 47 issues of wildly varying importance, fixes the three easiest, and invoices you.

The missing step is prioritisation by someone who understands both what the findings mean and what your business needs. That is normally the expensive part of hiring a consultant.

What the assistant actually does

It reads your technical audit, your security and domain health checks, your AI readiness scan and your page speed data together, which no single tab in any dashboard shows you.

Then it does the thing dashboards cannot: it ranks them against each other. A missing meta description on a page nobody visits and an expiring certificate are both "issues" in a list. Only one of them takes your website off the internet on a specific date.

It writes the result as instructions rather than findings. Not "H1 missing" but "this page has no main heading, add one that says X, here is why it matters for the keyword it is meant to rank for".

What comes back

A task list in priority order, in language a developer can act on without a further conversation, with the evidence for each item attached so nobody has to take your word for it. If your assistant also has access to your website through your own tools, it can go further and make the changes itself, then leave a dated note on your charts so the results actually get measured.

Try it on your own data

The connector is £5 per user per month on every plan. It reads snapshots already collected on your normal schedule, so asking this question as often as you like costs nothing extra.

Other things worth asking